In the "Problems with Tests: Authentic vs. Objective" presentation, the group did a good job of comparing and contrasting the two types of testing. I agree with the group that teachers shouldn't have to choose between the two forms of testing. Both forms of testing should be used to help educators better assess students.
With teachers already being asked to do more and more, a switch to strictly authentic testing seems next to impossible. I know I would have a difficult time creating all authentic tests for my students. It would not only take longer to create those tests, but longer to grade them as well. With that being said, technology would make the increased use of authentic testing more feasible. Authentic testing also allows educators to assess students using real-world situations, which will better prepare them for higher levels of education and future job opportunities.
Does Technology Actually Enhance the Learning We Seek? I believe the group did a good job of presenting opposing viewpoints as they detailed both pros and cons of technology. But even so, the pros seemingly outweigh the cons. It is hard to deny the impact technology has had on our society, both at home and in the workplace. Notice I didn't say at school. While technology is used in schools, we have barely scratched the surface of what is possible with the technologies available today. If we are to better prepare students for "the real world", then we as educators must find ways to integrate technology into our daily lessons. Using the technology isn't the goal, but rather the goal is to meet the educational objectives by using all available resources, including different technological tools. If we are able to use these tools to meet the objectives, then we are not only meeting our educational standards, but we are preparing students for a workplace where knowing how to use different technologies is a necessary skill.
No comments:
Post a Comment